Hiring still runs on inputs no one actually trusts.

Introve surfaces the behavioral patterns people show in real work, not how they talk about themselves, but how they actually operate.

first layer of nodes as circles representing stories and skills connected with lines layered on top of each other.second layer of nodes as circles representing stories and skills connected with lines layered on top of each other.third and final layer of nodes as circles representing stories and skills connected with lines layered on top of each other.

You can’t optimize your way out of garbage inputs.

Garbage in, garbage out.

The entire system runs on people describing themselves. Résumés, cover letters, even “skills” fields, all rely on what someone thinks is important about their work. But the very things that make someone exceptional are often the hardest to name. When you’re good at something, it feels obvious— like it must be how everyone does it. That’s why the real signals get buried, and hiring teams are left drowning in noise.

illustrated male character looking into a mirror at a blank reflection

We can’t see ourselves clearly.

People are poor at self-reporting because they can’t accurately see their own strengths. The skills that drive their impact are often invisible to them and missing from the story they tell.

Two illustrated female characters in tug-of-war

Everyone’s “optimizing,” and everyone’s losing.

AI has triggered an arms race across the hiring market. Candidates optimize résumés. Recruiters optimize filters. Neither side sees people clearly anymore and the whole market suffers from collapsing signal quality.

person leaping out of a paper

People evolve. Résumés don’t.

Work changes fast, and people even faster. Résumés and job descriptions can’t keep up. Static documents fail to capture how someone actually operates. especially in a world shaped by AI.

two puzzle pieces that don't quite fit together

It’s not just a bad hire. It’s a broken team.

Misalignment hurts more than budgets. It fractures teams, slows progress, and erodes collective performance. Every mismatch creates friction that compounds across the organization.

You can’t make high-stakes decisions with low-trust data.

Introve is building the behavioral signal layer: a system that captures how people actually work and turns it into structured, credible signals teams can trust.

Our first product, Mirra, does this through guided, conversational AI.

There’s no need to spin a project into something it wasn’t. Mirra listens for what’s real beneath the surface. It reflects the patterns behind someone’s real impact, not how they describe themselves, but how they show up across contexts. For many, it’s the first objective reflection of their strengths they’ve ever seen and it changes how they see themselves.

Beneath it all is a system built for scale:

  • A shared behavioral taxonomy
  • AI tuned to pattern detection without flattening nuance
  • Guardrails that preserve credibility and protect agency

We take trust seriously. Individuals choose which insights are shared and who gets to see them. Hiring teams only see what the candidate approves. Not raw transcripts, not personal context. Just grounded signals tied to real evidence.

Resumes aren’t going away overnight, but for the first time, we have something stronger to build on.

We could tell you...but they already did.

Real testers. Real stories.
Shared in job seeker communities of 3,600+ and catching the attention of hiring managers asking to pilot.

"The way it replies makes you feel good about what you did, but it's not empty praise. It pulls from your own words and shows the nuance instead of rinse and repeat resume lines."
Russell L.
"'Operationalizing ideas' isn't a phrase I would've used for myself, but it's true. Seeing it reflected back is helpful."
Erin G.
"What I like about this is it feels like a very empathetic approach to AI. It's actually solving my career struggles in a way that's helpful."
Christine M.
"I could see this as a hiring tool, too. Almost like pre-screening for emotional intelligence and how someone handles conflict. And unlike most hiring tools, the person actually gets useful feedback."
Jose M.
"I love the tone, friendly, warm, reassuring, supportive. It didn't feel like hype. It felt like it was reflecting back what I'd actually done."
Jeanette K.
"It took all the details and built a snapshot of where I excel and where I could improve. The growth transcript reads in third person, like something I could present to someone. I can see this being a great hiring tool."
Russell L.
"I wasn't prepared to go that deep, but it kept asking questions that made me think back and remember what really happened. It helped me realize that my master's project, that I thought was just another thing to finish, actually showed skills I can bring into the workplace."
Benny K.
"It helped me connect what I've been doing to those 'strategic' terms that always felt out of reach. Broken down this way, I can finally see how my work maps to the skills employers ask for."
Jeanette K.
"Parts of it felt like a mock interview, but in a good way. Almost like a career therapist. I could talk through nuance and even a project that didn't go well without having to spin it. It still surfaced real strengths in that story."
Jose M.
"Normally the deeper story would come out in the interview process, but you can't even get to the interview process these days. Recruiters are overwhelmed. The problem you're solving is how to separate thousands of applicants and actually find the ones who will succeed."
Prisca E.
"I thought I was telling a nerdy story about data, but this helped me see I was actually showing skills I never give myself credit for."
Kevin GF

For individuals - Try Mirra

Join The Mirra waitlist

For Companies

Inquire about a Pilot